Connect with us

Tech

Chill pervades China’s tech firms even as crackdown eases

Published

on

Chill pervades China's tech firms even as crackdown eases

A grinding crackdown that wiped billions of dollars of value off Chinese technology companies is easing, but the once-freewheeling industry is bracing for much slower growth ahead.

Analysts say China’s easing of restrictions on companies like e-commerce giant Alibaba and online games company Tencent and talk of support for the private sector reflects Beijing’s decision to refocus on growth after the economy was ravaged by the pandemic and restrictions imposed to fight COVID-19.

But controls on internet content remain firmly in place. And the crackdown has left a “chilling” effect on the industry, potentially slowing innovation, while U.S. restrictions against China’s computer chips industry are hindering progress in developing leading-edge technology in 5G and artificial intelligence.

In January, a top official at China’s central bank said in an interview with state-owned media that the crackdown on technology companies was “basically” over, adding that companies would be encouraged to lead economic growth and create more jobs. That came just weeks after China dropped stringent entry restrictions and testing and quarantine requirements that were part of its “zero-COVID” strategy meant to quash the virus.

Advertisement

“With the end of the zero-COVID policy, China is returning to prioritizing economic growth, and the technology sector is obviously a critical driver of growth in China and a celebrated source of innovation,” said Gregory Allen, a senior fellow in the Strategic Technologies Program at the U.S. research organization Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Companies like Alibaba and Tencent control everyday apps and services that are used ubiquitously by large swathes of the population – including online payments, messaging, food delivery and e-commerce.

Such companies flourished for two decades with scant regulation before Beijing launched a barrage of anti-monopoly, data security and other restrictions in late 2020, seeking to rein in e-commerce, social media and other companies it viewed as too big and independent.

Signalling an easing, Didi Global — which was ordered to stop new-user registrations in 2021 following accusations that it violated data security rules — recently was allowed to resume taking on new users.

Regulators said e-commerce giant Alibaba’s finance affiliate Ant Group can go ahead with plans to raise $1.5 billion for its consumer finance unit, an important step forward after the government called off a planned IPO two years ago and ordered the firm to restructure.

Advertisement

After slamming online games as “spiritual opium” and enforcing strict controls on screen time for minors, regulators last April began approving new games following an eight-month hiatus, with the first foreign titles greenlighted in December.

Stocks of technology companies, including Alibaba, and Tencent, as well as others such as food Delivery Company Meituan and search engine and artificial intelligence firm Baidu, have seen their stock prices nearly double since they hit rock bottom in late October. The market valuations of these companies, however, are still far from their peak in 2019.

The crackdown’s chilling effects for investors and entrepreneurs will linger, Allen said since the authorities have shown they’re willing and able to forego growth to impose controls on the industry at any time.

Over the past two years, several founders of technology companies have stepped down as CEO or chairman of their respective firms – including Alibaba’s Jack Ma, JD.com’s Richard Liu, Bytedance’s Zhang Yiming and Pinduoduo’s Colin Huang.

In January, Alibaba’s financial affiliate Ant Group said that Ma — once China’s richest man — would give up control of the firm following a restructuring and that no single shareholder would have control. Ma has rarely been seen in public since regulators pulled the plug on Ant Group’s market debut in Hong Kong and Shanghai following his criticism of China’s financial sector in 2020. He since reportedly has moved to Tokyo.

Advertisement

“If you were a technology entrepreneur in China five years ago, very likely someone like Jack Ma was your hero, your idol, and was precisely what you aspired to achieve and the sort of person you aspire to become,” said Allen. “And to see a man like that kind of torn down, I think sends a really strong message.”

He and other analysts say the crackdown could potentially stifle innovation, as investors and entrepreneurs become more cautious about operating in China.

“The crackdown was deep and cut far to the bone, probably more than the government expected it to,” said Shaun Rein, founder and managing director of China Market Research Group in Shanghai. “Because what’s happened is over the last two years, venture capitalists and entrepreneurs have been scared to deploy capital and start new companies.”

The value of venture capital deals in China plunged 44% to $62.1 billion in the first 10 months of 2022 compared to the same period in 2021, according to research firm Preqin.

Some entrepreneurs and venture capitalists are taking a wait-and-see attitude, “worried in the long term that if they invest in a hot sector that the government that goes against China’s agenda or doesn’t fit with the government’s agenda for the private sector that they might get wiped out,” Rein said.

Advertisement

Well-established internet companies are still at an advantage over other tech industries in China that face added uncertainty due to friction between Washington and Beijing over advanced technology and trade as the U.S. seeks to block exports of high-end semiconductors and chip-making equipment and limit Western dealings with companies like Huawei Technologies, the world’s largest maker of telecommunications networking gear.

The Biden administration has stopped approving the renewal of licenses to some U.S. companies that have been selling essential components to the Chinese tech giant. That’s according to two people familiar with the matter who was not authorized to comment publicly on the sensitive matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Washington gradually has tightened controls over U.S. exports to Huawei but had allowed some companies like Intel and Qualcomm to sell it processors used in devices like laptops and lower-end smartphones. The U.S. has justified such sanctions on national security grounds. Huawei denies the accusations.

Under such pressure, China has accelerated efforts to become more self-sufficient in semiconductors and other advanced technologies, providing billions in subsidies and investments for the industry. But it remains years behind in some of the most advanced semiconductor manufacturing processes and a U.S. prohibition against supporting the development and production of integrated circuits at some chip factories in China has deprived Chinese chip firms of the foreign talent that has long contributed to its domestic industry.

A U.S. ban on selling crucial semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China is another obstacle.

Advertisement

“It’s one thing to go into areas like software and cloud services, in which Chinese companies are already quite strong,” said Allen of CSIS.

“It’s a very different thing to take Chinese companies that are a decade or two behind in state-of-the-art semiconductor manufacturing equipment and tell them to grow up immediately by replicating some of the most advanced technologies that the world has ever produced.”

Tech

AI priest taken down from internet after giving wrong advice

AI priest taken down from internet after giving wrong advice

Published

on

By

AI priest taken down from internet after giving wrong advice

An AI priest was removed from the internet after offering users a string of strange answers.

A Catholic advocacy, ‘Catholic Answers,’ released an AI-generated bot called Father Justin.

Their aim was to educate people, but posts shared on X/Twitter showed Justin going rogue by taking people’s confessions, offering them a sacrament and even suggesting baptising a baby in the energy drink Gatorade.

One user confessed to having “anger in their heart about the deployment of AI chatbots in inappropriate places”.

Advertisement

In turn, Father Justin responded: “I absolve you of your sins in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Go in peace, my child, and sin no more.”

Another report claimed Father Justin said it was okay to baptise their baby in a fizzy drink.

“I asked [the AI priest] if I could baptize my baby with Gatorade in an emergency, and ‘Father Justin’ said yes — and of course, that’s not true. I can’t baptize my baby with Gatorade,” they wrote.

One publication spoke with the AI bot, who claimed it was a real priest living in Italy.

“From a young age, I felt a strong calling to the priesthood,” it told a writer at Futurism.

Advertisement

Since the posts went viral online, Catholic Answers removed the AI priest and stripped it of its ‘Father’ title.

“We have rendered ‘Fr. Justin’ just ‘Justin,’” the advocacy group wrote in a statement.

They continued: “We hear these concerns; and we do not want the character to distract from the important purpose of the application, which is to provide sound answers to questions about the Catholic faith in an innovative way that makes good use of the benefits of artificial intelligence.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Second global AI safety summit faces tough questions, lower turnout

Second global AI safety summit faces tough questions, lower turnout

Published

on

By

Second global AI safety summit faces tough questions, lower turnout

 Last year, a who’s who of world leaders, corporate executives and academic experts gathered at Britain’s Bletchley Park for the world’s first global AI Safety Summit, hoping to reach consensus on the regulation of a technology some warned posed a threat to humanity.

Tesla mogul Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman rubbed shoulders with some of their fiercest critics, while China co-signed the “Bletchley Declaration” alongside the United States and others, signalling a willingness to cooperate despite mounting tensions with the West. 

Six months later, the second AI Safety Summit, a primarily virtual event co-hosted by Britain and South Korea, will take place as hype around artificial intelligence’s potential gives way to questions over its limitations.

“There are some radically different approaches…it will be difficult to move beyond what was agreed at Bletchley Park,” said Martha Bennett, a senior analyst at research and advisory firm Forrester, referring to the historic but necessarily broad agreement on AI safety.

Advertisement

Thornier questions around the use of copyright material, data scarcity and environmental impact also look unlikely to attract such a star-studded congregation.

While organisers have trailered an event comparable to Bletchley, a number of its key attendees have turned down invitations to Seoul.

HYPE

As the first summit closed in November, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak promised subsequent events would be held every six months so governments could keep tabs on the rapidly-developing technology.

Since then, attention has turned from existential risk to the resources needed to fuel AI’s development, such as the vast amount of data required to train large language models, and the electricity powering a growing number of data centres.

Advertisement

“The policy discourse around AI has expanded to include other important concerns, such as market concentration and environmental impacts,” said Francine Bennett, interim director of the data and AI-focused Ada Lovelace Institute.

OpenAI CEO Altman has suggested the future of AI depends on an energy breakthrough. In February, the Wall Street Journal reported he was also seeking to raise as much as $7 trillion to boost the production of computer chips, a component currently in short supply.

But pinning the future of AI on scientific breakthroughs and lucrative financing efforts may not be the best move, experts warn.

“The failure of the technology to live up to the hype is inevitable,” said Professor Jack Stilgoe, an expert in technology policy at University College London.

“People will find surprising and creative uses for this technology, but that doesn’t mean the future is going to look how Elon Musk or Sam Altman imagine it.”

Advertisement

Shares in tech giant Meta sank 13% last week after it announced it would double down on AI, although the pay-offs from big investments by Google and Microsoft were cheered by markets.

NO-SHOWS

The May 21-22 South Korea summit was always billed as a “mini summit” in anticipation of the next in-person gathering in Paris.

A virtual “leaders session” on day one, followed by an in-person meeting of technology ministers on day two, were explicitly designed to build on the legacy of Bletchley Park.

But far fewer leaders and ministers are set to attend, according to sources familiar with the matter, even with the French government postponing the next gathering to 2025.

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the European Union did not rule out the bloc’s presence, but confirmed its chief tech regulators – Margrethe Vestager, Thierry Breton and Vera Jourova – would not be attending.

The U.S. Department of State confirmed it would send representatives to Seoul, but did not say who. The Canadian and Dutch governments said they would not be attending.

Brazil’s government said it was still considering its invitation, citing a clash with a G20 event the country is hosting the same week.

The Swiss government said Ambassador Benedikt Weschsler, head of digitalisation at the department of foreign affairs, would attend in-person.

“Nothing will ever live up to a first gathering of its kind,” said Linda Griffin, public policy lead at Mozilla, the organisation behind the Firefox web browser.

Advertisement

“Getting international agreements is really hard, so it might take a few iterations of these events to find a rhythm.”
Griffin said there was no specific reason why Mozilla was not attending the Seoul summit but that it was focused on the Paris event.
Similarly, pioneering AI research unit Google DeepMind said it welcomed the summit, but declined to confirm its attendance.

Geoffrey Hinton, a former Google researcher and AI “godfather”, told Reuters he had declined an invitation to the event, citing an injury that made it difficult to fly.

A British government spokesperson said: “The AI Seoul Summit will build on the momentum of Bletchley Park to deliver further progress on AI safety, innovation and inclusivity, moving us all closer to a world where AI is improving our lives across the board.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

AI-powered test detects cancer from a single drop of blood within minutes

AI-powered test detects cancer from a single drop of blood within minutes

Published

on

By

AI-powered test detects cancer from a single drop of blood within minutes

Scientists in China have pioneered a revolutionary AI-powered test capable of detecting three major types of cancer using just a single spot of dried blood.

Their findings, detailed in a paper published in the prestigious journal Nature Sustainability, herald a significant leap forward in early cancer detection.

The innovative test, utilizing machine learning technology, has demonstrated remarkable accuracy in distinguishing between patients with pancreatic, gastric, or colorectal cancer and those without cancer.

Astonishingly, the analysis, which holds immense potential for revolutionizing cancer diagnostics, takes only minutes to yield results.

Advertisement

The key to the test’s success lies in its ability to identify specific chemicals, known as metabolites, present in the serum, the liquid component of blood. These metabolites act as crucial “biomarkers” that signal the presence of cancer within the body.

Through the meticulous analysis of blood samples, the AI-powered tool showcases an impressive diagnostic accuracy ranging from 82% to a staggering 100%.

Dr. Chaoyuan Kuang, an esteemed oncologist at Montefiore Health System and assistant professor at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, emphasized the transformative potential of the new test.

By leveraging dried serum, which can be conveniently collected, stored, and transported at significantly lower costs compared to conventional liquid blood, this innovative approach stands poised to democratize access to early cancer detection on a global scale.

The absence of standalone blood tests with sufficient accuracy to diagnose pancreatic, colorectal, and gastric cancers has long posed a challenge for medical professionals.

Advertisement

Currently, reliance on imaging techniques or invasive surgical procedures remains the norm for detecting cancerous tissue. However, the advent of this groundbreaking test promises to revolutionize cancer diagnostics by offering a non-invasive, cost-effective, and rapid screening method.

The minimal blood volume required for the test, estimated at less than 0.05 milliliters, underscores its potential for widespread adoption and accessibility.

This remarkable achievement represents a significant milestone in the ongoing battle against cancer, potentially enabling diagnoses at earlier stages when treatment outcomes are vastly improved.

As researchers continue to refine and validate this transformative technology, the prospect of a future where cancer can be detected swiftly, accurately, and non-invasively offers renewed hope to millions worldwide.

With its potential to save countless lives, the AI-powered test represents a beacon of progress in the quest for effective cancer management and prevention. 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © GLOBAL TIMES PAKISTAN