Connect with us

Business

Forever in debt: Why US loans are getting longer

Published

on

Forever in debt: Why US loans are getting longer

Consumers facing high asset prices and rising interest rates have a few loan options. None are particularly attractive.

The story seems familiar to the consumers in Pakistan, as they too are facing similar problem due to the same reasons – alarming inflation and high interest rates. That’s why the car sales have nosedived in the country with the reduced purchasing power.

And unlike the US, the majority of consumers in Pakistan are opting to avoid buying spree, be it cars or mobile phones or homes. However, the affluent are still interested in real estate.

Reuters says the US buyers of homes or new cars might be better off waiting. But if you must go ahead, either face taking on a big monthly payment, or stretching out the loan term to keep the monthly bill down – as many are doing.

Advertisement

New car loans lasting 73-84 months (over six years) rose to 34.4 per cent of the market in 2022 from 28.6pc in 2018, according to auto information site Edmunds. A few borrowers are going even longer, with less than 1pc of new car loans lasting 85 months or more.

“It’s a reflection of the world we live in: Transportation affordability is a significant problem, as is housing,” said Ira Rheingold, executive director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates.

“More and more dealers are offering extended loan terms: Instead of three or four or five years, they are now going way beyond that,”

Rheingold added. “It’s the same thing with housing: Sometimes the only way to get someone into a house is to increase the mortgage length.”
Ultra-long loan terms are showing up in the housing market.

Homeowners straining to pay their Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgages can now apply to have their loans extended to 40 years to reduce monthly payments.

Advertisement

For personal loans closed through the LendingTree platform, the median term in May rose to 60 months from 57 months in April, and 54 months in March.

Stretching out a loan is not always a bad idea. It can be a solid foundation for family wealth if fixed at a low rate for an asset that appreciates over time such as a 30-year mortgage.

One principle applies, no matter what the asset, Rheingold advised. “Be very wary of extending the life of your loan, just to make it affordable in the short-term.”

Here are few tips from financial experts:

DO THE MATH

Advertisement

A lower monthly payment may seem attractive now, but a longer term loan will end up costing more in interest, likely at a higher rate to compensate the lender for additional risk. That is why such loans appeal to banks, but less to borrowers.

“Buyers should be very wary of taking lenders up on those offers,” said financial planner Eric Scruggs of Stoneham, Massachusetts.
For example, a $35,000 car, with a five-year loan at 3pc interest, would have a total of $37,734 in payments, he said. That same car financed over seven years at 5pc would cost $41,554 – $3,820 more.

MAKE SOME HARD DECISIONS

If you must keep pushing out the loan term to afford an asset, that may be a signal to get real.
“If you have to stretch out to a seven-year loan to buy a car, perhaps you should buy a less expensive car,” said Brandon Gibson, a Dallas financial planner.

BEWARE OF SLIDING ‘UNDERWATER’

Advertisement

Extending loans further into the future means increasing the amount of time you could be “underwater,” or owe more than the asset is worth. That certainly happens with cars, but also with homes in eras of declining prices, as during the subprime mortgage crisis of 2007 to 2008.
“This situation triggers a host of issues,” said Erin Witte, director of consumer protection for the Consumer Federation of America. “Being underwater can make it very difficult to trade in a car in future when you need a new one.
“Consumers are faced with the situation of ‘negative equity,’ where they still owe money on the car they want to trade in and end up rolling that debt into the finance contract on the new car,” Witte added. “Unfortunately, that means the consumer is now paying interest on that debt twice.”

Business

FBR set to block SIMs of over 500,000 non-filers

FBR set to block SIMs of over 500,000 non-filers

Published

on

By

FBR set to block SIMs of over 500,000 non-filers

In a bid to tighten the screw on non-filers, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has decided to block the mobile SIMs of 506,000 non-filers.

The Income Tax General Order has been issued to materialise the initiative. 

As per the order, the FBR has identified those people whose income tax returns have not been filed.  

“Despite being able to pay income tax, they are not filing returns and therefore they are not included in FBR Active Tax Payers List,” the statement added. 

Advertisement

According to the FBR, the mobile phone connections of those who have not filed income tax returns could be closed any time. 

The institution has sought a detailed report from the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority. 

Sources said a list of 500,000 individuals on whom the authorities are zooming in just represents the first phase and has been given a final shape after detailed discussions involving the FBR, the PTA and the mobile phone operators. 

It is reported that the FBR had actually identified two million possible tax evaders, but the mobile phone companies requested that they could not block such a huge number of SIMs in one go.

The current economic crisis is a result of dismal tax-to-GDP ratio in Pakistan – one of the lowest in Pakistan – which is a product of the government failure to expand the tax base, resulting in an alarming increase in indirect taxation and further burdening those who already pay the amount.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Oil falls for a third day amid easing Middle East tensions, increased production

Oil falls for a third day amid easing Middle East tensions, increased production

Published

on

By

Oil falls for a third day amid easing Middle East tensions, increased production

 Oil prices fell for a third day on Wednesday amid increasing hopes of a ceasefire agreement in the Middle East and on rising crude inventories and production in the US, the world’s biggest oil consumer.

Both oil price benchmarks were down more than 1 per cent at 10:35 GMT. Brent crude futures for July were $1.15 lower at $85.18 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures for June were $1.21 cents lower at $80.72 per barrel.

Expectations that a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas could be in sight, following a renewed push led by Egypt to revive stalled negotiations between the two, pushed oil prices lower.

“The potential for a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas has eased concerns of an escalation of the conflict and any possible disruptions to supply,” ANZ analysts said in a note on Wednesday.

Advertisement

However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed on Tuesday to go ahead with a long-promised assault on the southern Gaza city of Rafah, whatever the response by Hamas to the latest proposals for a halt to the fighting and a return of Israeli hostages.

RISING INVENTORIES AND SUPPLY

Also pressuring prices were swelling US crude oil inventories and rising crude supply.

US crude oil inventories rose 4.906 million barrels in the week ended April 26, according to market sources citing American Petroleum Institute figures, which defied expectations for a decline of 1.1 million barrels.

Traders will be waiting to see if official data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) due at 1430 GMT confirms the build.

Advertisement

US production rose to 13.15 million barrels per day (bpd) in February from 12.58 million bpd in January, its biggest monthly increase in about 3-1/2 years, the EIA said on Tuesday.

“Continued signs of inflation also raised concerns about demand for crude oil. This comes ahead of the US driving season, where demand for gasoline rises strongly,” analysts at ANZ said.

Keeping oil from slipping further, output by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) was seen falling by 100,000 bpd in April to 26.49 million bpd, a Reuters survey found on Tuesday.

The survey reflected lower exports from Iran, Iraq and Nigeria against a backdrop of ongoing voluntary supply cuts by some members agreed with the wider OPEC+ alliance.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Fiscal deficit in July-March 2023-24 touches Rs4,337bn

Fiscal deficit in July-March 2023-24 touches Rs4,337bn

Published

on

By

Fiscal deficit in July-March 2023-24 touches Rs4,337bn

Fiscal deficit in the first nine months of 2023-24 reached Rs4,337 billion, as Pakistan continues to feel the effects of rupee devaluation and the failure to increased tax-to-GDP ratio, which is one of the worst around the globe.

Official figures released by the finance ministry show that the government expenditures had jumped to Rs13,682bn during the July-March period of 2023-24 – the current fiscal year – at a time when overall revenue collection remained at Rs1,682bn.

It again shows Islamabad’s inability to reduce fiscal or budget deficit – a product of small tax net, a plethora of subsidies extended to powerful business interests and absence of economic activities due high interest rates, which could boost revenue generation.

With lucrative sectors like real estate and retail as well as large agriculture landholdings not paying the taxes, the successive governments have always opted for indirect taxation – a practice that always overburden the ordinary people.

Advertisement

Out of the total government income, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) contributed Rs6,711bn through tax collection.

As far as the remaining amount is concerned, the non-tax revenue stood at Rs2,517 out of which the share of petroleum development levy (PDL) was Rs719.59 – a record amount in Pakistan’s history despite the reduced consumption of POL products. It represented an increase of Rs247bn when compared to the corresponding period of previous fiscal year.

Obviously, it is result of the government decision to follow the International Monetary Fund (IMF) conditions to increase the PDL on petrol and other petroleum products, thus keeping the fuel prices higher – a policy that is sustaining and fuelling the inflation in the longer run.

Meanwhile, the Centre transferred Rs3,815bn to provinces under the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award – a constitutional mechanism to ensure that the federating units get their rightful share in national resources.

The government expenditures under different important heads are given as: defence Rs1,222bn, pensions Rs611bn, subsidies Rs473bn and development projects [Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP)] Rs270bn.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © GLOBAL TIMES PAKISTAN