pakistan
‘My career of 280 years’: Biden jokes off 2024 age concerns
Joe Biden served in the Senate for 270 years. He used to be three years older than his sister Valerie, but now has 20 years on her. And the fourth US president — whom Biden affectionally calls “Jimmy” Madison — is a good friend.
All kidding aside, the 80-year-old Biden will tell you, he is at the end of his career, not the beginning. He’s been doing this for a long time. And he’s gotten a “hell of a lot of wisdom” over those years, making him deserving of a second term.
As Biden, the oldest president in US history, embarks on his reelection campaign, he is increasingly musing aloud about his advanced age, cracking self-deprecating jokes and framing his decades in public life as a plus, hoping to convince voters his age is an asset rather than a vulnerability.
In short, he’s trying to own it.
“I stand here humbled being the first sitting president of the United States to have an opportunity to speak at Ebenezer Sunday service,” Biden said in January at the historic Atlanta church where Martin Luther King, Jr. was the co-pastor. “You’ve been around for 136 years. I know I look like it, but I haven’t.”
The octogenarian president’s comments about his age can be serious, woven into broader remarks and often used to underscore a broader point.
When Biden told the Irish parliament last month that he has never been more optimistic about the future, he notably added, “And I’m at the end of my career, not the beginning.”
“The only thing I bring to this career after my age — as you can see how old I am — but is a little bit of wisdom,” Biden continued to the approving crowd. “I come to the job with more experience than any president in American history. It doesn’t make me better or worse, but it gives me few excuses.”
Other times, Biden — his mood buoyed by a crowd full of supporters, whether among Democratic lawmakers or at a lively union hall — is often speaking off-the-cuff, eager to make the audience laugh by poking a little fun at himself. At the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner on April 29, Biden made his age an early — and frequent — punchline.
“You guys were founded 122 years ago – that’s not when I got endorsed,” Biden told a crowd of machine operators and engineers with the International Union of Operating Engineers in Accokeek, Md., in April. He referenced “my career of 280 years here” at a Black History Month reception before being interrupted by laughter, and at an Air Force event last month, Biden noted that President Dwight Eisenhower addressed the first class of the Air Force Academy more than six decades ago but that “I wasn’t there … no matter what the press says.”
Whether deliberate or candid, it’s nonetheless a strategy that evokes how Ronald Reagan defused questions about his age — then 73 — during the 1984 campaign. In a debate against 56-year-old Democrat Walter Mondale, Reagan pledged he would not make age an issue nor “exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience.”
Biden is “doing exactly what he should be doing. He’s embracing it, he’s having fun with it, he’s doing exactly what Ronald Reagan did — injecting humor and self-deprecation into it,” said Michael LaRosa, a former press secretary for first lady Jill Biden who also worked on the president’s 2020 campaign. “By saying the quiet part out loud, everyone is in on the joke. He knows his age, and he’s not pretending to be somebody he’s not. And that’s the most important quality in a candidate.”
The president could also find himself with a general election challenger nearly as old as he is, potentially neutralizing the issue of his own age. Donald Trump, the leading Republican candidate, is 76 years old, although voters have shown less concern about his age and sharpness compared to that of Biden, according to some polls. Trump, for his part, insists the issue is “not age” — it’s Biden’s mental acuity.
Former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, struggling to gain traction in the still-forming GOP primary field, has consistently made Biden’s age a centerpiece of her campaign — even going as far as saying he may not make it to the end of his second term, when he’ll be 86 years old.
Biden’s personal doctor said after the president’s most recent physical exam in February that Biden “remains a healthy, vigorous 80-year-old male, who is fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency.”
Still, the public remains wary about Biden’s capacity to do his job. A majority — 57% — of voters in last year’s midterm elections said they did not think Biden “has the mental capability to serve effectively as president,” according to AP VoteCast, an extensive survey of the 2022 electorate. Forty-one percent of voters said Biden did.
About 9 in 10 Republicans, along with about 2 in 10 Democrats, said they thought Biden doesn’t have the mental capability to serve as president. Among Democrats, though, voters under 45 were roughly twice as likely as older voters to say they thought Biden doesn’t have the mental capability, 27% vs. 13%.
An April poll by The Associated Pres-NORC Centre for Public Affairs Research showed a notable chasm between the percentage of Democrats who approve of Biden’s job performance — 78% — and those who wanted him to run again, which was at just 47%. Interviews with poll respondents suggested that the gulf was due in big part to the president’s age.
Biden’s aides have long dismissed such concerns. To counter the age questions, his reelection campaign is likely to stress his accomplishments to highlight his fitness to do the job, while underscoring the with-age-comes-experience argument that Biden himself likes to make.
“Part of President Biden’s argument for reelection is that he has decades of experience,” said Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del. “I think if he can balance the occasional self-deprecating joke with showing the kind of agility, engagement, casual approach to this issue that he did at the correspondents’ dinner, that he did in the State of the Union, that he has in meetings with small groups of senators in public and in private, I think that’s an asset.”
In a new MSNBC interview last week, Biden again dismissed concerns about his age, saying, “I have acquired a hell of a lot of wisdom and know more than the vast majority of people.”
Biden’s advisers also note that his age surfaced as an issue in the 2020 campaign and did not derail his path to the White House. Some of his more nominal challengers in that year’s Democratic presidential primary, such as former Housing and Urban Development secretary Julian Castro and former Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan, made veiled references to Biden’s age and mental acuity, but that did not gain traction among other candidates. (One of them, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., is older than Biden.)
Biden has conceded in the past that his age is a legitimate issue for voters, and said shortly after his reelection announcement that he took a “hard look” at that before he formalized his decision to run for a second term.
“If I guess how old I am, I can’t even say the number. It doesn’t — it doesn’t register with me,” he said at a news conference with South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol last month. “But the only thing I can say is that one of the things that people are going to find out — they’re going to see a race, and they’re going to judge whether or not I have it or don’t have it.”
pakistan
Mohsin Naqvi sees new chapter in Pak-US relations under Trump
Federal Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi has expressed optimism that Pak-US relations will enter a new phase under President Donald Trump’s leadership.
In separate meetings with U.S. Congressmen Joe Wilson and Rob Bresnahan, Minister Naqvi discussed mutual interests, enhancing bilateral ties, and cooperation in various fields.
The discussions also addressed resolving issues faced by overseas Pakistanis and achieving sustainable peace in the region, particularly concerning the situation in Afghanistan.
Both sides emphasised the need for increased exchanges of trade and cultural delegations.
Minister Naqvi assured full cooperation at all levels to strengthen Pak-US relations and extended an invitation to the Congressmen to visit Pakistan.
The Interior Minister highlighted that the U.S. remained a critical strategic partner for Pakistan, with relations spanning several decades. He praised President Trump’s commitment to global peace and conflict resolution, describing his leadership as a beacon of hope for the world.
Pakistan’s Ambassador to the U.S., Rizwan Saeed Sheikh, was also present during the meetings
pakistan
SC additional registrar submits response to show-cause notice in contempt case
In response to the contempt of court notice regarding the rescheduling of the case related to powers of bench, Supreme Court Additional Registrar Nazar Abbas submitted his reply to the show-cause notice.
In his response, Additional Registrar Nazar Abbas requested the withdrawal of the show-cause notice, asserting that he did not defy any judicial orders. He stated that he had submitted a note regarding the matter of forming a bench based on the judicial order to the Practice and Procedure Committee.
A two-member bench of the Supreme Court, consisting of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Aqeel Abbasi, is hearing the contempt of court show-cause notice case.
Judicial assistant Hamid Khan began his arguments.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, engaging in a dialogue with lawyer Hamid Khan, inquired whether a judicial order could be changed administratively.
Advocate Hamid Khan replied that an administrative order could not alter a judicial order. He explained that the Supreme Court’s formation is under Article 175, and judicial power is vested in the entire Supreme Court. The definition of the Supreme Court is clear; all judges are included, and it cannot be stated that only a specific judge can exercise the Supreme Court’s power.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah remarked that this is a separate issue, and if the case were about interpreting Article 191-A, this question could have arisen. However, the case at hand pertains to the return of the Judges Committee, and the Chief Justice of Pakistan and Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan are part of that committee.
On the surface, it appears that the two-member judges committee ignored the judicial order. If the judges’ committee disregards a judicial order, the matter can be referred to the full court. The court sought assistance on this matter.
Justice Aqeel Abbasi remarked that there seems to be confusion regarding the issue. He asked Hamid Khan how he views Article 191-A.
Hamid Khan noted that in the past, the Supreme Court had the authority to make rules regarding the formation of benches, but now some of those powers had been reduced. The question of the 26th amendment might arise here.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah further questioned whether in any country, the executive, rather than the judiciary, forms a bench. He asked Hamid Khan if he could provide an example.
Hamid Khan responded that there was no such example.
The court asked whether, under the rules of 1980, the full court would be constituted by Chief Justice of Pakistan or by a committee. Can the matter of forming the full court be sent to the Judges Committee through a judicial order?
Hamid Khan responded that the section 2-A of the Regular Judges Committee Act does not align with Article 191-A. He emphasised that Parliament can increase, but not reduce, the judiciary’s powers. He also wanted to give an example of Article 191-A.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah remarked that this power is separate from the current case. These questions are related to the 26th constitutional amendment.
Hamid Khan continued that Article 191-A mentions constitutional benches, but there is no mention of a constitutional bench in the Supreme Court. At least a five-judge constitutional bench can be formed, and in this situation, three constitutional benches can be formed.
The senior-most judge will head the bench. He argued that since Article 191-A does not align with section 2-A of the Judges Committee Act, it is unconstitutional.
With Hamid Khan’s arguments concluded, the court adjourned the hearing for a brief period.
pakistan
ATC issues arrest warrants for Omar Ayub in May 9 vandalism case
The Sargodha Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) has issued arrest warrants for opposition leader in the National Assembly, Omar Ayub, for his failure to appear in the case related to the May 9 riots and vandalism.
The hearing was held in the Sargodha ATC, where tight security measure were at place. The case pertains to the unrest and property damage that took place in Mianwali on May 9 2023.
Several accused, including Punjab Assembly opposition leader Ahmed Khan Bhuchar, Sanam Javed, Aalia Hamza, MNA Bilal Ijaz, and dozens of other workers, appeared in court.
However, Omar Ayub failed to attend the hearing for the third consecutive time. His lawyers submitted a medical certificate on his behalf.
The court expressed anger over his continuous absence, remarking that Omar Ayub had missed three hearings in a row.
As a result of his non-appearance, the court was unable to frame charges against the other accused. The court has now issued arrest warrants for the senior PTI leader, Omar Ayub.
The court has adjourned the case until January 30th for further proceedings.
-
Business2 months ago
Auto industry’s shift toward EVs is expected to go on despite Trump threat to kill tax credits
-
Entertainment3 months ago
Beyoncé leads the 2025 Grammy noms, becoming the most nominated artist in the show’s history
-
Business3 months ago
Wall Street cruises toward the close of its best week in a year
-
World2 months ago
Six Israeli troops killed, deadly strikes in Lebanon
-
pakistan3 months ago
PM Shehbaz terms promotion of foreign investment as top priority
-
Business2 months ago
Wall Street gains ground as it notches a winning week and another Dow record
-
Entertainment2 months ago
Movie Review: ‘Red One’ tries to supersize the Christmas movie
-
Sports1 month ago
Southampton set to sign Juric as new manager