Connect with us

pakistan

ECP lawyer completes final arguments in Toshakhana gifts case

Published

on

ECP lawyer completes final arguments in Toshakhana gifts case

A district and sessions court in Islamabad on Thursday resumed hearing of a plea filed by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) against the PTI chief for concealing details of Toshakana gifts. 

Additional District and Sessions Judge Humayun Dilawar conducted hearing on the complaint against the PTI chairman. Niazullah Niazi and Amjad Pervez appeared in court on behalf of the PTI chief and the ECP, respectively. 

Meanwhile, the counsel for the ECP completed his arguments in the case. 

Advancing arguments, PTI chairman’s lawyer Niazi said former prime minister’s appeals were lying pending with the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and the Supreme Court (SC). He prayed to the court to wait for the final decision in the cases. 

Advertisement

Sessions Judge Humayun Dilawar said he had asked PTI counsel Khawaja Haris to complete his arguments till Friday (today). Now it was up to him (Haris) to complete arguments or not. Niazi said he would advance arguments but they had cases pending in other courts on Toshakhana gifts.

The ADSJ asked the ECP lawyer to advance final arguments in the case.

Amjad Pervez, the lawyer of the Election Commission, said the gifts from the Toshakhana and the challan submitted to the national treasury were also part of the record. The issue of identification of the gifts was before court. The PTI chairman admitted in his reply what gifts he had received, he said. 

He said 58 gifts were given to the PTI chairman (as the prime minister) and his wife. The PTI chairman said he purchased gifts worth Rs21.66 million which also included watches and valuable mobiles. 

Pervez said the PTI chairman had accepted the list of gifts and he paid for 20 per cent of the gifts in 2018-19. He stated nothing was written in the column of jewellery in Form B and no word about valuable gifts was written in the form. 

Advertisement

The ECP lawyer said the word Toshakhana was mentioned in the tax return but the gifts of Toshakhana were not written in Form B. He said the PTI chairman did not have a single vehicle of his own according to Form B. 

Judge Humayun Dilawar, addressing the PTI lawyer, said Friday was the last day for final arguments. “You should know that today all arguments will be locked. If the application is accepted, then the matter is over, otherwise you should advance final arguments,” the ADSJ said.

After that, the judge adjourned the Toshakhana case hearing. 

Advertisement

pakistan

Court reserves verdict on PTI founder’s bail plea in May 9 case

Court reserves verdict on PTI founder’s bail plea in May 9 case

Published

on

By

Court reserves verdict on PTI founder's bail plea in May 9 case

The Islamabad district and sessions court has reserved verdict on the bail plea of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in the May 9 case.

Judicial Magistrate Omar Shabbir heard the case against the PTI leader registered in Shahzad Town police station.

Naeem Haider Panjhota, Sardar Masroof and Amina Ali appeared before the judge as counsel for the PTI leader.

The lawyers said the case against the PTI founder had not been pursued by an authorised officer. All cases against him had been instituted on the basis of politics and should, therefore, be quashed, they demanded.

Advertisement

The court after listening to the arguments reserved the verdict.

Continue Reading

pakistan

Rawalpindi court bins plea for initiating case against former commissioner Liaquat Chattha

Rawalpindi court bins plea for initiating case against former commissioner Liaquat Chattha

Published

on

By

Rawalpindi court bins plea for initiating case against former commissioner Liaquat Chattha

 The Rawalpindi Sessions Court on Thursday dismissed a petition seeking the registration of a case against former Rawalpindi commissioner Liaquat Ali Chattha.

Additional District and Sessions Judge Hakim Khan issued a two-page written order on the petition.

In its order, the court observed that apart from the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), a departmental inquiry was also being conducted against the former commissioner.

If the allegations were proven in the ECP and departmental inquiries, a legal action was certain, the order stated, adding that in this situation, there was no justification for registering a separate case against the former Rawalpindi commissioner.

Advertisement

Two lawyers from Rawalpindi had filed the petition seeking the registration of a case against former commissioner.

In a Feb 18 presser, the former commissioner admitted that elections in his division were “rigged”.

The commissioner accused Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Sikandar Sultan Raja of being complicit in the rigging and asserted that he, along with the CEC and Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa, deserved punishment, even the death penalty, for their injustice.

Chattha expressed remorse for forcing his subordinates to engage in wrongdoing and admitted that winning candidates were made to lose on 13 seats in the Rawalpindi division.

Later on Feb 23, Chattha retracted his earlier statement in a written statement submitted to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

Advertisement

In the statement, Chattha confessed to having supported the narrative of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) about rigging in the general elections and maligning state institutions in exchange for a lucrative position in the future.

He stated he had been made this offer by a Lahore-based PTI leader with whom he had developed a close friendship.

Chattha alleged that “this entire planning had been formulated after consultation and approval of the senior leadership of PTI”.

He stated that this proposal was made by the said [PTI] individual in consideration of the fact that he was about to retire from service after having remained a part of the services for 32 years and enjoyed all the perks and privileges.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

pakistan

IHC orders Zartaj Gul to appear before court with record in ECL name removal case

IHC orders Zartaj Gul to appear before court with record in ECL name removal case

Published

on

By

IHC orders Zartaj Gul to appear before court with record in ECL name removal case

Islamabad High Court (IHC) has sought the record from Zartaj Gul’s counsel on a petition seeking the name removal of PTI leader and MNA Zartaj Gul from the Exit Control List (ECL).

IHC’s Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri heard the case on Zartaj Gul’s name removal from ECL.

During the hearing, the state counsel stated that Zartaj Gul’s name has been included in the Provisional National Identification List (PNIL).

Upon inquiry from the court, the state counsel informed that Zartaj Gul’s name was included in PNIL on the order of Islamabad and Punjab police, and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) was responsible for including the name in PNIL.

Advertisement

Also read: PTI’s Shibli Faraz, Raja Basharat, Zartaj Gul secure bail in May 9 cases

State counsel added that five cases were registered against Zartaj Gul in Islamabad and Punjab.

The petitioner’s counsel, Advocate Usama, disclosed that Zartaj Gul has been granted bail in those cases. He reiterated that the name was being included in the PNIL list despite being on bail.

During the hearing, Justice Tariq Jahangiri inquired about how many cases Zartaj Gul has been granted bail in and ordered the petitioner to appear before the court in the next hearing.

Consequently, IHC has adjourned the case hearing until next week by directing Zartaj Gul’s counsel to appear before the court in the next hearing with records. 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © GLOBAL TIMES PAKISTAN