Connect with us

Tech

Lab-grown diamonds put natural gems under pressure

Lab-grown diamonds put natural gems under pressure

Published

on

Lab-grown diamonds put natural gems under pressure

The glittering diamonds sparkle the same but there are key differences: mined natural gems are more than a billion years old, while laboratory-made rocks are new and cost less than half the price.

Man-made gems are reshaping the $89 billion global diamond jewellery market, especially in the west Indian city of Surat where 90 percent of the world’s diamonds are cut and polished.

In Smit Patel’s gleaming lab, technicians drop crystal diamond “seed” slices into reactors mimicking the extreme pressure far underground.

“Once the customer sees it for herself, they are sold. I believe this is the future,” said Patel, director of Greenlab Diamonds and the third generation of his family to deal in diamonds.

Advertisement

From seed to ring-ready jewels, his team takes less than eight weeks to produce a diamond virtually indistinguishable from a mined gem.

“It’s the same product, it’s the same chemical, the same optical properties,” Patel said.

Gas, heat, pressure

Lab-grown diamond exports from India tripled in value between 2019 and 2022, while export volumes rose by 25 percent between April and October 2023, up from 15 percent in the same period a year earlier, according to the latest industry data.

“We’ve grown at 400 percent year on year in volume,” Patel told AFP.

Reactors in labs such as Patel’s are pumped full of carbon-containing gases such as methane and the crystal grows under heat and pressure.

Advertisement

Rough diamonds are then taken to another facility where hundreds of workers design, cut and polish the stones.

The global market share by value of lab-grown gems rocketed from 3.5 percent in 2018 to 18.5 percent in 2023, New York-based industry analyst Paul Zimnisky told AFP, and will likely exceed 20 percent this year.

That has heaped pressure on an industry already racked by geopolitical turmoil and slumping demand.

– ‘Clean’ stones –

Machine-made diamonds were first developed in the early 1950s but it took technological leaps to create a commercially viable process less than a decade ago.

Advertisement

Producers boast that their gems come at a lower carbon cost, although there are questions about whether the energy-intensive process is any better for the environment.

Patel said his lab uses solar energy from the local grid, although others suck up electricity from carbon-heavy sources.

And while mined gem sellers say “conflict diamonds” from war zones are kept off the market through the international Kimberley Process certification scheme, lab producers argue their facilities guarantee a clean record.

Such environmental and humanitarian claims have helped make lab-grown stones a popular choice for engagement rings.

In February 2023, 17 percent of diamond engagement rings sold in the United States — the world’s biggest consumer of natural stones — used lab-grown gems, according to industry analyst Edahn Golan.

Advertisement

By Golan’s assessment, it is now 36 percent. This has partly been made possible by hundreds of companies in China and India, both among the largest producers of man-made stones.

‘Perfect storm’

Indian lab diamond makers exported 4.04 million carats between April and October 2023, a 42 percent year-on-year increase, according to India’s Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC).

In contrast, natural diamond companies in India reported a more than 25 percent drop, to 11.3 million carats, over the same period.

While natural diamond sales during the Covid-19 pandemic surged as affluent shoppers sought to brighten lockdowns with luxury purchases, demand dropped when economies reopened. Top companies were left holding expensive excess stock.

Advertisement

Ajesh Mehta from D.Navinchandra Exports, whose group is one of global diamond giant De Beers Group’s authorised buyers, or “sightholders”, said it was the worst slump in his 30-year career.

“This is a totally different kind of lack of demand,” Mehta told AFP. “Everything came like a perfect storm.”

Factors other than competition from lab-grown rivals included slowing economic growth in the all-important US and China markets, as well as oversupply and sanctions against Russian rough-cut diamonds.

India’s natural diamond industry was forced into a rare voluntary import ban on rough diamonds in October. “We had to press the reset button,” Mehta said. “Otherwise people would panic.”

At least five Indian sightholders told AFP that the De Beers Group had cut prices by between 10 and 25 percent for different categories of diamonds at the first sale of its year, when buyers restock after the US holiday season.

Advertisement

‘No monopoly’

The lab-grown industry has had its problems, too. Supply has skyrocketed and prices have dropped drastically, with wholesale prices down by 58 percent in 2023 alone, according to Golan’s analysis.

Retailers in Surat told AFP the price of a lower-quality one-carat polished stone had fallen from $2,400 in 2022 to a little over $1,000 in 2023.

WD Lab Grown Diamonds, the second-biggest US producer of the man-made stones, filed for bankruptcy in October. But Patel argues that falling prices will spur demand.

“We knew that prices would come down, because there’s no monopoly in this industry,” he said. Customers in a jewellery showroom in India’s commercial capital Mumbai appeared to agree.

Advertisement

“A mined diamond would be five times more expensive,” said 29-year-old Lekha Prabhakar. “If you want something you want to wear daily… a lab-grown diamond works. I really like that.” 

Tech

Don’t worry if your Android gets stolen, new Theft Detection Lock comes to rescue

Don’t worry if your Android gets stolen, new Theft Detection Lock comes to rescue

Published

on

By

Don't worry if your Android gets stolen, new Theft Detection Lock comes to rescue

Google revealed plans to introduce a ground-breaking security feature for Android devices: Theft Detection Lock at the Google I/O 2024 developer conference held on Wednesday.

This innovative addition is specifically designed to combat the rising threat of smartphone theft by automatically locking the device when suspicious activity is detected.

Powered by artificial intelligence, Theft Detection Lock utilizes advanced algorithms to identify common motions associated with theft.

For instance, if a device suddenly begins moving rapidly in the opposite direction, indicative of a potential theft scenario, the feature swiftly triggers a screen lock mechanism.

Advertisement

This proactive measure aims to thwart thieves from easily accessing sensitive user data stored on the device.

In addition to Theft Detection Lock, Google also announced the introduction of an Offline Device Lock feature. This functionality serves as a safeguard against intentional disconnection from the network, a common tactic employed by thieves to bypass security measures.

Instances such as repeated failed authentication attempts will prompt the Offline Device Lock, providing an added layer of protection for users’ devices.

Google revealed plans to enhance device security with measures aimed at preventing remote factory resets initiated by thieves.

Under the forthcoming update, if a thief attempts to reset a stolen device, they will be unable to set it up again without the necessary device or Google account credentials. This strategic move renders stolen devices essentially unsellable, significantly diminishing the incentives for phone theft.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Tech

Tesla must face vehicle owners’ lawsuit over self-driving claims

Tesla must face vehicle owners’ lawsuit over self-driving claims

Published

on

By

Tesla must face vehicle owners' lawsuit over self-driving claims

A U.S. judge on Wednesday rejected Tesla’s bid to dismiss a lawsuit accusing Elon Musk’s electric car company of misleading owners into believing that their vehicles could soon have self-driving capabilities.

The proposed nationwide class action accused Tesla and Musk of having since 2016 falsely advertised Autopilot and other self-driving technology as functional or “just around the corner,” inducing drivers to pay more for their vehicles. 

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco said owners could pursue negligence and fraud-based claims, to the extent they relied on Tesla’s representations regarding vehicles’ hardware and ability to drive coast-to-coast across the U.S.

Without ruling on the merits, Lin said that “if Tesla meant to convey that its hardware was sufficient to reach high or full automation, the plainly alleges sufficient falsity.”

Advertisement

The judge dismissed some other claims.

Tesla and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lawyers for Tesla vehicle owners did not immediately respond to similar requests.

The case was led by Thomas LoSavio, a retired California lawyer who said he paid an $8,000 premium in 2017 for Full Self-Driving capabilities on a Tesla Model S, believing it would make driving safer if his reflexes deteriorated as he aged.

LoSavio said he was still waiting for the technology six years later, with Tesla remaining unable “even remotely” to produce a fully self-driving car.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for people who since 2016 bought or leased Tesla vehicles with Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features.

Advertisement

Tesla has for many years faced federal probes into whether its self-driving technology might have contributed to fatal crashes.

Federal prosecutors are separately examining whether Tesla committed securities fraud or wire fraud by misleading investors about its vehicles’ self-driving capabilities, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Tesla has said Autopilot lets vehicles steer, accelerate and brake in their lanes, and Full Self-Driving lets vehicles obey traffic signals and change lanes.

But it had acknowledged that neither technology makes vehicles autonomous, or excuses drivers from paying attention to the roads.

The case is In re Tesla Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-05240.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft asks hundreds of China staff to relocate

Microsoft asks hundreds of China staff to relocate

Published

on

By

Microsoft asks hundreds of China staff to relocate

Microsoft is asking about 700 to 800 people in its China-based cloud-computing and artificial-intelligence operations to consider transferring outside the country, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

The employees, mostly engineers with Chinese nationality, were earlier in the week offered an option to transfer to countries including the U.S., Ireland, Australia and New Zealand, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter.

The move comes amid spiralling US-China relations as the Biden administration cracks down on various sectors of Chinese imports, including electric vehicle (EV) batteries, computer chips and medical products.

A Microsoft spokesperson told the Journal that providing internal opportunities is part of its global business and confirmed the company had shared an optional internal transfer opportunity with a subset of employees. 

Advertisement

Reuters reported earlier this month that the U.S. Commerce Department is considering a new regulatory push to restrict the export of proprietary or closed source AI models, whose software and the data it is trained on are kept under wraps.

The spokesperson, however, told the newspaper that the company remains committed to the region and will continue to operate in China.

Microsoft didn’t immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © GLOBAL TIMES PAKISTAN