Connect with us

Tech

Europe’s Digital Markets Act is forcing tech giants to make changes. Here’s what that will look like

Europe’s Digital Markets Act is forcing tech giants to make changes. Here’s what that will look like

Published

on

Europe's Digital Markets Act is forcing tech giants to make changes. Here's what that will look like

Europeans scrolling their phones and computers this week will get new choices for default browsers and search engines, where to download iPhone apps and how their personal online data is used.

They’re part of changes required under the Digital Markets Act, a set of European Union regulations that six tech companies classed as “gatekeepers”, Amazon, Apple, Google parent Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft and TikTok owner ByteDance, will have to start following by midnight Wednesday.

The DMA is the latest in a series of regulations that Europe has passed as a global leader in reining in the dominance of large tech companies.

Tech giants have responded by changing some of their long-held ways of doing business such as Apple allowing people to install smartphone apps outside of its App Store. 

Advertisement

Here’s a look at how the Digital Markets Act will work:

WHAT COMPANIES HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES?

Some 22 services, from operating systems to messenger apps and social media platforms, will be in the DMA’s crosshairs.

hey include Google services like Maps, YouTube, the Chrome browser and Android operating system, plus Amazon’s Marketplace and Apple’s Safari Browser and iOS.

Meta’s Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp are included as well as Microsoft’s Windows and LinkedIn.

Advertisement

The companies face the threat of hefty fines worth up to 20% of their annual global revenue for repeated violations — which could amount to billions of dollars — or even a breakup of their businesses for “systematic infringements.”

WHAT EFFECT WILL THE RULES HAVE GLOBALLY?

The Digital Markets Act is a fresh milestone for the 27-nation European Union in its longstanding role as a worldwide trendsetter in clamping down on the tech industry.

The bloc has previously hit Google with whopping fines in antitrust cases, rolled out tough rules to clean up social media and is bringing in world-first artificial intelligence regulations.

Now, places like Japan, Britain, Mexico, South Korea, Australia, Brazil and India are drawing up their own versions of DMA-like rules aimed at preventing tech companies from dominating digital markets.

Advertisement

“We’re seeing copycats around the world already,” said Bill Echikson, senior fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, a Washington-based think tank. The DMA “will become the defacto standard” for digital regulation in the democratic world, he said.

Officials will be looking to Brussels for guidance, said Zach Meyers, assistant director at the Center for European Reform, a think tank in London.

“If it works, many Western countries will probably try to follow the DMA to avoid fragmentation and the risk of taking a different approach that fails,” he said.

HOW WILL DOWNLOADING APPS CHANGE?

In one of the biggest changes, Apple has said it will let European iPhone users download apps outside its App Store, which comes installed on its mobile devices.

Advertisement

The company has long resisted such a move, with a big chunk of its revenue coming from the 30% fee it charges for payments such as for Disney+ subscriptions, made through iOS apps. Apple has warned that “sideloading” apps will come with added security risks.

Now, Apple is cutting those fees it collects from app developers in Europe that opt to stay within the company’s payment-processing system.

But it’s adding a 50-euro cent fee for each iOS app installed through third-party app stores, which critics say will deter the many existing free apps whose developers currently don’t pay any fee from jumping ship.

“Why would they possibly opt into a world where they have to pay a 50 cent per-user fee?” said Avery Gardiner, Spotify’s global director of competition policy.

“So those alternative app stores will never get traction, because they’ll be missing this huge chunk of apps that would need to be there in order for customers to find the store attractive.”

Advertisement

“That is utterly at odds with the very purpose of the DMA,” Gardiner added. Brussels will be closely scrutinizing whether tech companies are complying.

EU competition chief Margrethe Vestager said this week that after 10 years on the job, “I have seen quite a number of antitrust cases and quite a lot of creativity built into how to work around the rules that we have.”

HOW WILL PEOPLE GET MORE OPTIONS ONLINE?

Consumers won’t be forced into default choices for key services.

Android users can pick which search engine to use by default, while iPhone users will get to choose which browser will be their go-to. Europeans will see choice screens on their devices. Microsoft, meanwhile, will stop forcing people to use its Edge browser.

Advertisement

The idea is to stop people from being nudged into using Apple’s Safari browser or Google’s Search app. But smaller players still worry that they might end up worse off than before.

Users might just stick with what they recognize because they don’t know anything about the other options, said Christian Kroll, CEO of Berlin-based search engine Ecosia.

Ecosia has been pushing for Apple and Google to include more information about rival services in the choice screens.

“If people don’t know what the alternatives are, it’s rather unlikely that many of them will select an alternative,” Kroll said. “I’m a big fan of the DMA. I am not sure yet if it will have the results that we’re hoping for.”

HOW WILL INTERNET SEARCHES CHANGE?

Advertisement

Some Google search results will show up differently, because the DMA bans companies from giving preference to their own services.

So, for example, searches for hotels will now display an extra “carousel” of booking sites like Expedia. Meanwhile, the Google Flights button on the search result display will be removed and the site will be listed among the blue links on search result pages.

Users also will have options to stop being profiled for targeted advertising based on their online activity. Google users are getting the choice to stop data from being shared across the company’s services to help better target them with ads.

Meta is allowing users to separate their Facebook and Instagram accounts so their personal information can’t be combined for ad targeting.

The DMA also requires messaging systems to be able to work with each other.

Advertisement

Meta, which owns the only two chat apps that fall under the rules, is expected to come up with a proposal on how Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp users can exchange text messages, videos and images.

Tech

Don’t worry if your Android gets stolen, new Theft Detection Lock comes to rescue

Don’t worry if your Android gets stolen, new Theft Detection Lock comes to rescue

Published

on

By

Don't worry if your Android gets stolen, new Theft Detection Lock comes to rescue

Google revealed plans to introduce a ground-breaking security feature for Android devices: Theft Detection Lock at the Google I/O 2024 developer conference held on Wednesday.

This innovative addition is specifically designed to combat the rising threat of smartphone theft by automatically locking the device when suspicious activity is detected.

Powered by artificial intelligence, Theft Detection Lock utilizes advanced algorithms to identify common motions associated with theft.

For instance, if a device suddenly begins moving rapidly in the opposite direction, indicative of a potential theft scenario, the feature swiftly triggers a screen lock mechanism.

Advertisement

This proactive measure aims to thwart thieves from easily accessing sensitive user data stored on the device.

In addition to Theft Detection Lock, Google also announced the introduction of an Offline Device Lock feature. This functionality serves as a safeguard against intentional disconnection from the network, a common tactic employed by thieves to bypass security measures.

Instances such as repeated failed authentication attempts will prompt the Offline Device Lock, providing an added layer of protection for users’ devices.

Google revealed plans to enhance device security with measures aimed at preventing remote factory resets initiated by thieves.

Under the forthcoming update, if a thief attempts to reset a stolen device, they will be unable to set it up again without the necessary device or Google account credentials. This strategic move renders stolen devices essentially unsellable, significantly diminishing the incentives for phone theft.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Tech

Tesla must face vehicle owners’ lawsuit over self-driving claims

Tesla must face vehicle owners’ lawsuit over self-driving claims

Published

on

By

Tesla must face vehicle owners' lawsuit over self-driving claims

A U.S. judge on Wednesday rejected Tesla’s bid to dismiss a lawsuit accusing Elon Musk’s electric car company of misleading owners into believing that their vehicles could soon have self-driving capabilities.

The proposed nationwide class action accused Tesla and Musk of having since 2016 falsely advertised Autopilot and other self-driving technology as functional or “just around the corner,” inducing drivers to pay more for their vehicles. 

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco said owners could pursue negligence and fraud-based claims, to the extent they relied on Tesla’s representations regarding vehicles’ hardware and ability to drive coast-to-coast across the U.S.

Without ruling on the merits, Lin said that “if Tesla meant to convey that its hardware was sufficient to reach high or full automation, the plainly alleges sufficient falsity.”

Advertisement

The judge dismissed some other claims.

Tesla and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lawyers for Tesla vehicle owners did not immediately respond to similar requests.

The case was led by Thomas LoSavio, a retired California lawyer who said he paid an $8,000 premium in 2017 for Full Self-Driving capabilities on a Tesla Model S, believing it would make driving safer if his reflexes deteriorated as he aged.

LoSavio said he was still waiting for the technology six years later, with Tesla remaining unable “even remotely” to produce a fully self-driving car.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for people who since 2016 bought or leased Tesla vehicles with Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features.

Advertisement

Tesla has for many years faced federal probes into whether its self-driving technology might have contributed to fatal crashes.

Federal prosecutors are separately examining whether Tesla committed securities fraud or wire fraud by misleading investors about its vehicles’ self-driving capabilities, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Tesla has said Autopilot lets vehicles steer, accelerate and brake in their lanes, and Full Self-Driving lets vehicles obey traffic signals and change lanes.

But it had acknowledged that neither technology makes vehicles autonomous, or excuses drivers from paying attention to the roads.

The case is In re Tesla Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-05240.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft asks hundreds of China staff to relocate

Microsoft asks hundreds of China staff to relocate

Published

on

By

Microsoft asks hundreds of China staff to relocate

Microsoft is asking about 700 to 800 people in its China-based cloud-computing and artificial-intelligence operations to consider transferring outside the country, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

The employees, mostly engineers with Chinese nationality, were earlier in the week offered an option to transfer to countries including the U.S., Ireland, Australia and New Zealand, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter.

The move comes amid spiralling US-China relations as the Biden administration cracks down on various sectors of Chinese imports, including electric vehicle (EV) batteries, computer chips and medical products.

A Microsoft spokesperson told the Journal that providing internal opportunities is part of its global business and confirmed the company had shared an optional internal transfer opportunity with a subset of employees. 

Advertisement

Reuters reported earlier this month that the U.S. Commerce Department is considering a new regulatory push to restrict the export of proprietary or closed source AI models, whose software and the data it is trained on are kept under wraps.

The spokesperson, however, told the newspaper that the company remains committed to the region and will continue to operate in China.

Microsoft didn’t immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © GLOBAL TIMES PAKISTAN